ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025
CRISPR/Cas system-mediated transgene-free or DNA-free genome editing in plants.
Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transgene-free genome editing in plants.aBIOTECH · 2026Review
- Negative Regulators of Rice Agronomic Traits: Functional Insights and Applications in Genome Editing-Based Breeding.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Research Progress on Preparation, Transformation and Application of Protoplasts Derived from Medicinal Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From QTL mapping to genome editing: advances and integrated strategies for improving aluminum tolerance in crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Next-generation CRISPR systems and advanced delivery paradigms for precision crop improvement: a comparative case study in sugar beet (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Beyond GMOs: transgene-free gene-edited crops for global food security.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Gene editing to enhance biotic stress tolerance in sugarcane.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas-based genome-editing technology serves as a powerful and versatile tool for genome modification. It has been broadly utilized in crop breeding to enhance traits such as yield, various quality attributes, and biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. Because of public safety concerns over genetically modified organisms (GMOs), many countries have established stringent regulatory policies for genetically modified plants, dramatically limiting the application of related products. However, genome editing in stably transformed plants can result in transgene-free progeny through self-pollination or hybridization or yield DNA-free gene-edited plants via transient transformation. These edited plants materially differ from GMOs and are referred to as genome-edited organisms (GEOs). GEOs have the potential to alleviate regulatory burdens and aid in commercialization. Various methods have been developed to expedite the creation of transgene-free or DNA-free GEOs. This review summarizes the various strategies for creating these types of GEOs based on the CRISPR/Cas systems. It also covers the advantages and drawbacks of these strategies. Additionally, we examine off-target effects and mitigation strategies for plant genome editing and outline regulatory policies for gene-edited crops in selected countries and regions. We hope this review offers valuable references for the advancement of transgene-free and DNA-free GEOs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40794116What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.