ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Development and validation of machine learning models to predict vertebral artery injury by C2 pedicle screws.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Cervical Pedicle Screw Malposition from Clinical and Anatomical Features.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Implant Positioning, Dislocation Risk Prediction, and Surgical Indications in Orthopaedic Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Are AI Neuroimaging Models Ready for Clinical Use? A Systematic Methodological Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCervical 2 pedicle screw (C2PS) fixation is widely used in posterior cervical surgery but carries risks of vertebral artery injury (VAI), a rare yet severe complication. This study aimed to identify risk factors for VAI during C2PS placement and develop a machine learning (ML)-based predictive model to enhance preoperative risk assessment.
methodsClinical and radiological data from 280 patients undergoing head and neck CT angiography were retrospectively analyzed. Three-dimensional reconstructed images simulated C2PS placement, classifying patients into injury (n = 98) and non-injury (n = 182) groups. Fifteen variables, including characteristic of patients and anatomic variables were evaluated. Eight ML algorithms were trained (70% training cohort) and validated (30% validation cohort). Model performance was assessed using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for interpretability.
resultsSix key risk factors were identified: pedicle diameter, high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA), intra-axial vertebral artery (IAVA), vertebral artery diameter (VAD), distance between the transverse foramen and the posterior end of the vertebral body (TFPEVB) and distance between the vertebral artery and the vertebral body (VAVB). The neural network model (NNet) demonstrated optimal predictive performance, achieving AUCs of 0.929 (training) and 0.936 (validation). SHAP analysis confirmed these variables as primary contributors to VAI risk.
conclusionThis study established an ML-driven predictive model for VAI during C2PS placement, highlighting six critical anatomical and radiological risk factors. Integrating this model into clinical workflows may optimize preoperative planning, reduce complications, and improve surgical outcomes. External validation in multicenter cohorts is warranted to enhance generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40794115What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.