ReviewAnesthesiology2025
Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Cardiac Output Method Comparison Studies (COMPARE) Statement.
Review in Anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Agreement of minimally invasive pulse wave analysis with pulmonary artery and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026Pooled it
- We need article reporting standards for quantitative research in sport and exercise science: an educational narrative review.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Review
- Automated hemodynamic resuscitation system for computer-controlled norepinephrine, vasopressin, and fluid therapy in endotoxin-induced shock: a feasibility and physiological proof-of-concept study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of the Low Cardiac Index Score: a simplified bedside tool for continuous intraoperative screening.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Near-infrared spectroscopy for estimating mixed venous oxygen saturation and cardiac output during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective observational study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Reliability of bioreactance and arterial waveform analyses in monitoring stroke volume variation during cardiac surgery.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac output is a key cardiovascular variable quantifying global blood flow. The measurement performance of cardiac output monitoring methods is investigated in validation studies, which are method comparison studies determining the agreement between cardiac output values measured with a test method and those measured with a reference method. The StatistiCal analysis and repOrting of cardiac output Method comPARison studiEs (COMPARE) statement provides a framework for designing, performing, and reporting cardiac output method comparison studies and includes a checklist of 29 items that are essential for reporting of those studies. Considering and reporting the items specified in the COMPARE checklist will help standardize cardiac output method comparison studies and increase the external validity of the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.