ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025
Tracing Sources and Stage-Specific Impacts of Heavy Metal Contamination in Farmed Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Implications for Human Health Risk.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Spirulina Ameliorates Arsenic-Induced Toxicity in Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Tracing Sources and Stage-Specific Impacts of Heavy Metal Contamination in Farmed Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Implications for Human Health Risk.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe levels of five heavy metals-zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd) and arsenic (As)-in soil, water, feed and fish were investigated in this study at different culture phases (early, nursery, grower and harvest) of Oreochromis niloticus (tilapia). Unlike previous studies that focused on one or two sources, this research provides a comprehensive assessment across all major inputs during the entire production cycle, offering new insight into potential contamination pathways.
resultsHeavy metal accumulation varied across sources and stages. Cr and As in sediment, and Cr in feed at the early stage, exceeded the permissible boundaries set by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). As the culture progressed, sediment showed increasing levels of Pb, Cr and As, all surpassing safe thresholds during the nursery to harvest phases. Feed also retained elevated Cr concentrations throughout. In contrast, water samples showed minimal contamination, and heavy metal levels in fish stayed within acceptable bounds for human consumption, although Zn and Cr gradually increased toward harvest. These findings suggest that sediment and feed are the primary sources of heavy metal accumulation, with water contributing minimally.
conclusionThe results indicate that tilapia raised in contaminated environments may not pose an immediate risk to consumers, but long-term exposure through sediment and feed can lead to gradual metal build-up. Therefore, routine monitoring of feed quality and sediment conditions is critical for safe aquaculture practices. These findings offer valuable guidance for hatchery operators and fish farmers, emphasising the need for preventive strategies to ensure the sustainable and safe production of tilapia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.