Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40792519›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

A Comprehensive Framework for Parkinson's Disease Detection Using Spiral Drawings and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques.

Mohamed J Saadh, Waleed K Abdulsahib, Hardik Doshi, Anupam Yadav, J Gowrishankar, Mayank Kundlas, Nargiza Mansurova, Kamal Kant Joshi, Fadhil Feez Sead, Bagher Farhood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed J SaadhFaculty of Pharmacy, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan.
Waleed K AbdulsahibDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Al Farahidi University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Hardik DoshiMarwadi University Research Center, Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Anupam YadavDepartment of Computer Engineering and Applications, GLA University, Mathura, India.
J GowrishankarDepartment of Computer Science Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed to Be University), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Mayank KundlasCentre For Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Nargiza MansurovaMedical Faculty, Central Asian University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Kamal Kant JoshiDepartment of Allied Science, Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Fadhil Feez SeadDepartment of Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.
Bagher FarhoodDepartment of Medical Physics and Radiology, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2290-7220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to create a reliable and scalable framework for detecting Parkinson's disease (PD) using spiral drawings. It integrates advanced machine learning techniques to improve diagnostic accuracy and practical application in clinical settings. MATERIALS AND

methodsSpiral drawing data were collected from a comprehensive dataset, including samples from both Parkinson's patients and healthy individuals. Three deep learning models-ResNet50, VGG16, and EfficientNetB0-were used to extract detailed patterns from the drawings. To enhance model performance, four feature selection techniques were applied: Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and ANOVA. Six different classifiers (Support Vector Machine [SVM], Random Forest [RF], Multi-Layer Perceptron [MLP], XGBoost, CatBoost, and voting classifiers) were tested. The system's diagnostic accuracy was measured using four metrics: accuracy, sensitivity, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. Heatmaps and ROC curves were created to visualize the results.

resultsThe models achieved high classification performance with different configurations. For example, ResNet50 with PCA and MLP reached the highest accuracy (98%) and AUC-ROC (97%). Similarly, SVM with PCA achieved accuracy (92%) and AUC-ROC (98%). For VGG16, combining LASSO with XGBoost resulted in high F1-scores (90%) and AUC-ROC (93%), while the voting classifiers with PCA achieved an AUC-ROC of 98%. EfficientNetB0 combined with RFE and XGBoost delivered exceptional accuracy (98%) with robust overall metrics. CatBoost with LASSO achieved balanced performance, showing high sensitivity (89%) and AUC-ROC (96%). Ensemble methods, like voting classifiers, consistently provided strong AUC-ROC values but showed variability in accuracy and sensitivity compared to individual classifiers like MLP and SVM.

conclusionsThe study demonstrated that combining advanced techniques for feature extraction, selection, and classification can significantly improve PD detection accuracy. Future research should focus on integrating multiple data sources and exploring real-time applications to enhance scalability and clinical utility.

Indexed as

Machine LearningParkinson DiseaseAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrincipal Component AnalysisSupport Vector Machinedeep learningfeature selectionmachine learningParkinson's diseasespiral drawings

Identifiers

PMID40792519
PMCPMC12340714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.