ArticleBrain and behavior2025
A Comprehensive Framework for Parkinson's Disease Detection Using Spiral Drawings and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinically Deployable Handwriting Biomarkers of Parkinson's Disease via Multiscale Attention and Bayesian-Genetic Optimization.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Research advances in key genes and regulatory mechanisms of posttranslational modifications in Parkinson's disease.PloS one · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Framework for Parkinson's Disease Detection Using Spiral Drawings and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to create a reliable and scalable framework for detecting Parkinson's disease (PD) using spiral drawings. It integrates advanced machine learning techniques to improve diagnostic accuracy and practical application in clinical settings. MATERIALS AND
methodsSpiral drawing data were collected from a comprehensive dataset, including samples from both Parkinson's patients and healthy individuals. Three deep learning models-ResNet50, VGG16, and EfficientNetB0-were used to extract detailed patterns from the drawings. To enhance model performance, four feature selection techniques were applied: Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and ANOVA. Six different classifiers (Support Vector Machine [SVM], Random Forest [RF], Multi-Layer Perceptron [MLP], XGBoost, CatBoost, and voting classifiers) were tested. The system's diagnostic accuracy was measured using four metrics: accuracy, sensitivity, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. Heatmaps and ROC curves were created to visualize the results.
resultsThe models achieved high classification performance with different configurations. For example, ResNet50 with PCA and MLP reached the highest accuracy (98%) and AUC-ROC (97%). Similarly, SVM with PCA achieved accuracy (92%) and AUC-ROC (98%). For VGG16, combining LASSO with XGBoost resulted in high F1-scores (90%) and AUC-ROC (93%), while the voting classifiers with PCA achieved an AUC-ROC of 98%. EfficientNetB0 combined with RFE and XGBoost delivered exceptional accuracy (98%) with robust overall metrics. CatBoost with LASSO achieved balanced performance, showing high sensitivity (89%) and AUC-ROC (96%). Ensemble methods, like voting classifiers, consistently provided strong AUC-ROC values but showed variability in accuracy and sensitivity compared to individual classifiers like MLP and SVM.
conclusionsThe study demonstrated that combining advanced techniques for feature extraction, selection, and classification can significantly improve PD detection accuracy. Future research should focus on integrating multiple data sources and exploring real-time applications to enhance scalability and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.