Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40792367›Full record

ReviewAnesthesia and pain medicine2025

From revival to routine: electromyography-based neuromuscular monitoring in contemporary anesthesia practice.

Chang-Hoon Koo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chang-Hoon KooDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitoring has emerged as a pivotal advancement in anesthesia, offering enhanced precision and reliability in assessing neuromuscular blockade. This review describes the physiological foundations of EMG, the methodologies for quantifying compound muscle action potential, and the comparative utility of EMG over traditional acceleromyography. Clinical applications across various muscle sites-specifically the adductor pollicis, first dorsal interosseous, and abductor digiti minimi-are explored, emphasizing inter-muscle variability and its implications for dosing of reversal agents. EMG-based monitoring is associated with reduced calibration time, improved stability against signal drift, and superior prevention of residual neuromuscular blockade. However, EMG monitoring presents unique challenges, including signal artifacts and device-specific variations in response thresholds. Recent comparative studies have demonstrated the importance of understanding device-specific characteristics to optimize clinical interpretations. Collectively, this evidence supports the use of EMG as a standard modality for perioperative neuromuscular management. Its accurate and reproducible signals, combined with broad clinical compatibility, present a compelling case for widespread adoption in routine anesthetic practice.

Indexed as

AcceleromyographyAction potentialsDelayed emergence from anesthesiaElectromyographyNeuromuscular blockadeNeuromuscular monitoringSugammadex

Identifiers

PMID40792367
PMCPMC12340696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.