ArticleCureus2025
Design and Implementation of an Electronic Patient Record via Adaptation of Existing Hospital Software.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the aim of improving efficiency and addressing limitations in paper-based clinical documentation, two resident doctors developed a customised electronic system for clinical note documentation on hospital wards. Using iterative co-design and active engagement with clinical colleagues, a ward moved from paper-based ward note-taking to electronic documentation. To demonstrate the benefits, the team conducted a comparative trial, assessing the in-house developed electronic patient record (EPR) system against the traditional paper notes in terms of efficiency and impact on working conditions. Following validation, the results were presented to, and endorsed by, the specialty Clinical Governance team. An implementation plan was subsequently formulated to introduce the EPR system across multiple hospital wards, utilising a stepwise approach. Various challenges emerged, leading to further iterative refinements to address issues encountered during each rollout phase. Challenges included raising hospital-wide awareness of participating wards, distributing training materials via channels compatible with real-world work patterns, overcoming hesitation about transition from paper-based systems, and addressing logistical hurdles with IT hardware deployment, which impaired the efficiency gains of the EPR system. Despite these challenges, the intervention demonstrated significant improvement in the timely handover of care at discharge from the hospital, with delays beyond 72 hours being eliminated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.