ArticleCureus2025
Evaluating Neonatal Oxygen Saturation From a Moderate Altitude to Below Sea Level: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Pulse oximetry is a vital tool for screening critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) in newborns. However, fixed thresholds may not account for physiological variations caused by altitude. This study evaluates the impact of elevation on normal neonatal oxygen saturation (SpO₂) in Jordan, spanning sites from moderate altitude to below sea level. Methods In a cross-sectional study, 149 healthy, full-term newborns were screened at three hospitals located at 1,050 m (Amman), sea level (Aqaba), and 420 m below sea level (Dead Sea). Preductal and postductal SpO₂ measurements were taken between 24 and 72 hours of life using standardized protocols. Statistical analyses, including analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD), were used to compare SpO₂ levels across altitudes. Results Mean upper-limb SpO₂ was significantly lower at 1,050 m (96.6%) compared to sea level (98.0%) and sub-sea level (97.8%) (p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for lower-limb SpO₂. No significant differences were found between sea-level and sub-sea-level sites. Despite lower SpO₂ at moderate altitude, no newborns met the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) criteria for CCHD. Conclusion Moderate altitude results in a statistically significant, but modest, reduction in neonatal SpO₂, potentially increasing false-positive rates in CCHD screening. Our findings support the development of altitude-specific screening protocols to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary interventions. Further research with larger and more diverse populations is needed to inform altitude-adjusted guidelines, particularly in geographically varied regions like Jordan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.