ReviewCureus2025
Keeping Lectures Alive in Undergraduate Medical Education: Current Status, Evolution, and Future Goals.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of artificial intelligence-enhanced virtual patients in educational approaches to medical interview training: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Obesity care education in Canadian medical schools: A multi-site qualitative study.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Review
- How to Implement Structured Case-Based Resource Sessions Within the Medical Curriculum.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- An Effective Team: Active Learning Also Needs the Sage on a Stage.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lectures have been the cornerstone of education for centuries. As society has modernized, science has elucidated multiple key aspects required for effective learning and retention of knowledge. In the last several decades, undergraduate medical education (UME) has changed with the incorporation of mandatory active small group learning and self-directed study in pre-clerkship education. Lectures have become non-mandatory school activities with poor attendance by students and a sore subject by the UME community. In addition, the use of standardized national exams throughout medical school has paved the way for the use of third-party commercial resources focused on "high-yield" materials that are widely supported by students and schools. Consequently, medical students have begun to forego traditional didactics in favor of commercial resources and self-study time. Hence, there is a growing frustration among faculty over poor attendance and engagement. However, lectures and seminars have continued to thrive in clerkships, graduate medical education, and continuing medical education despite the downfall in pre-clerkship education. Lectures in pre-clerkship education may need to be restructured and delivered in a style that fits the growing educational needs of advanced adult learners. This article critically reviews the historical role and current status of lecture in UME, while providing recommendations for future actionable changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.