Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40792330›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Keeping Lectures Alive in Undergraduate Medical Education: Current Status, Evolution, and Future Goals.

Beatrice C Thomas, Georgina C Tiarks, Ghaith Al-Eyd, Vijay Rajput

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. An Effective Team: Active Learning Also Needs the Sage on a Stage.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beatrice C ThomasDepartment of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA.
Georgina C TiarksDepartment of Internal Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, D.C., USA.
Ghaith Al-EydDepartment of Medical Education, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Vijay RajputDepartment of Medical Education, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lectures have been the cornerstone of education for centuries. As society has modernized, science has elucidated multiple key aspects required for effective learning and retention of knowledge. In the last several decades, undergraduate medical education (UME) has changed with the incorporation of mandatory active small group learning and self-directed study in pre-clerkship education. Lectures have become non-mandatory school activities with poor attendance by students and a sore subject by the UME community. In addition, the use of standardized national exams throughout medical school has paved the way for the use of third-party commercial resources focused on "high-yield" materials that are widely supported by students and schools. Consequently, medical students have begun to forego traditional didactics in favor of commercial resources and self-study time. Hence, there is a growing frustration among faculty over poor attendance and engagement. However, lectures and seminars have continued to thrive in clerkships, graduate medical education, and continuing medical education despite the downfall in pre-clerkship education. Lectures in pre-clerkship education may need to be restructured and delivered in a style that fits the growing educational needs of advanced adult learners. This article critically reviews the historical role and current status of lecture in UME, while providing recommendations for future actionable changes.

Indexed as

didacticseducationlecturemedical schoolundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID40792330
PMCPMC12338854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.