Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40792254›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2025

Machine learning-based identification of key biotic and abiotic drivers of mineral weathering rate in a complex enhanced weathering experiment.

Iris Janssens, Thomas Servotte, Tullia Calogiuri, Steven Mortier, Harun Niron, Thomas Corbett, Reinaldy P Poetra, Lukas Rieder, Michiel Van Tendeloo, Abhijeet Singh and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Iris JanssensDepartment of Computer Science, University of Antwerp - imec - IDLab, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2961-8341
Thomas ServotteDepartment of Mathematics, University of Antwerp - imec - IDLab, Antwerp, Belgium.
Tullia CalogiuriSoil Biology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6059-1636
Steven MortierDepartment of Computer Science, University of Antwerp - imec - IDLab, Antwerp, Belgium.
Harun NironDepartment of Bioscience Engineering, Biobased Sustainability Engineering (SUSTAIN), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5303-7024
Thomas CorbettDepartment of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-0373
Reinaldy P PoetraCenter for Earth System Research and Sustainability, University of Hamburg, Institute for Geology, Hamburg, Germany.
Lukas RiederCenter for Earth System Research and Sustainability, University of Hamburg, Institute for Geology, Hamburg, Germany.
Michiel Van TendelooDepartment of Bioscience Engineering, Biobased Sustainability Engineering (SUSTAIN), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Abhijeet SinghDepartment of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0807-6080
Steven LatréDepartment of Computer Science, University of Antwerp - imec - IDLab, Antwerp, Belgium.
Siegfried E VlaminckDepartment of Bioscience Engineering, Biobased Sustainability Engineering (SUSTAIN), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jens HartmannCenter for Earth System Research and Sustainability, University of Hamburg, Institute for Geology, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1878-9321
Jan Willem van GroenigenSoil Biology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Anna NeubeckDepartment of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Alix VidalSoil Biology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ivan A JanssensDepartment of Biology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5705-1787
Mathilde HagensDepartment of Soil Chemistry, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3980-1043
Sara ViccaDepartment of Bioscience Engineering, Biobased Sustainability Engineering (SUSTAIN), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9812-5837
Tim VerdonckDepartment of Mathematics, University of Antwerp - imec - IDLab, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimization of enhanced mineral weathering as a carbon dioxide removal technology requires a comprehensive understanding of what drives mineral weathering. These drivers can be abiotic and biotic and can interact with each other. Therefore, in this study, an extensive 8-week column experiment was set up to investigate 30 potential drivers of mineral weathering simultaneously. Methods: The setup included various combinations of rock types and surface areas, irrigation settings, biochar and organic amendments, along with various biota and biotic products such as earthworms, fungi, bacteria and enzymes; each varying in type or species and quantity. The resulting changes in dissolved, solid, and total inorganic carbon (∆TIC), and total alkalinity were calculated as indicators of carbon dioxide removal through mineral weathering. Three machine learning models, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) regression, were used to predict these indicators. Dominant drivers of the best performing model were investigated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: SHAP analysis revealed that each CDR indicator was influenced by different factors. However, key drivers were consistently abiotic, though biota also made a significant contribution to the predictions. The most representative CDR indicator, ∆TIC, was predominantly driven by steel slag addition and mixed rock grain sizes but was also substantially impacted by earthworms and microbes. Conclusions: These findings provide valuable insights into the complex interplay of numerous abiotic and biotic factors that affect mineral weathering, highlighting the potential of machine learning to unravel complex relationships in biogeochemical systems.

Indexed as

carbon sequestrationenhanced mineral weatheringexplainable AImachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40792254
PMCPMC12338168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.