ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
The evaluation of periodontal ligament cell viability for an avulsed tooth using various storage media: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many storage mediums are available for the storage of avulsed teeth to preserve the viability of periodontal ligament (PDL) cells before replantation; however, it is unclear which medium is the optimal option Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various storage media in preserving the viability of periodontal ligament (PDL) cells, using Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) as a reference standard for comparison. Review method: This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. The database including Medline (via. PUBMED), Scopus, The Cochrane Controlled Clinical trials Register, Google scholar were thoroughly searched from 2014 to 2024. The reference articles which have been retrived were exported to Mendeley Desktop software 1.13.3.43. Result: HBSS medium did not show significant difference in cell viability when compared with placentrix (Mean difference: 0.56, 95 % CI(-5.64,-0.04), p = 0.05, I2 = 96 %), whereas aloevera showed superior cell viability compared to HBSS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.