ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Blood microbiome signatures in systemic diseases: current insights, methodological pitfalls, and future horizons.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome Dysbiosis in Cancer Development: Mechanisms and Biomarker Potential.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Viral metagenomic analysis of the blood virome in patients with multiple autoimmune diseases.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Host-Microbiota Metabolic Interactions in Atherosclerosis: Oral, gut, and Blood Perspectives.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Assessment of 16S rRNA sequencing for analysis of circulating microbial DNA in colorectal cancer patients-proof of concept and early changes during experimental chemoimmunotherapy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Research advance in correlation between childhood asthma and gut microbiota.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human-associated microbiome, encompassing diverse microbial communities across body sites, plays a pivotal role in maintaining host homeostasis. Disruption of this balance, termed dysbiosis, has been implicated in a spectrum of pathophysiological conditions. Traditionally, blood was considered a sterile microenvironment. However, emerging insights into the blood microbiome challenge the paradigm of blood sterility, revealing microbial signatures, including cell-free DNA and viable taxa, with putative implications for host physiology and disease. The blood taxonomic profile at the phylum level is dominated by Proteobacteria, with Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes following in abundance. Dysbiosis in blood microbiome composition may indicate or contribute to systemic dysregulation, pointing to its potential role in disease etiology. These findings highlight the blood microbiome as a possible driver in the pathogenesis of infectious and non-infectious diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, and immune-mediated conditions. The detection of specific microbial profiles in circulation holds promise for biomarker discovery, enhancing disease stratification, and informing precision therapeutic strategies. However, advancing this field requires overcoming methodological challenges, including contamination control, standardization, and reproducibility. This review aims to present blood microbiome biomarkers across infectious, non-infectious, neurodegenerative, and immune-mediated diseases, while critically examining methodological variations, controversies, limitations, and future research directions. Elucidating these factors is critical to advancing blood microbiome biomarker validation and therapeutic targeting, thereby refining mechanistic insights into systemic disease pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.