ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Regulating addictive algorithms and designs: protecting older adults from digital exploitation beyond a youth-centric approach.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolution and reconstruction of digital addiction: from compulsive consumption in the internet era to symbiotic dependence in the artificial intelligence era.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Identity reconstruction and digital addiction: the paradoxical mechanism of digital inclusion among the new generation of older adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Algorithm-associated digital addiction among older adults: mechanisms and public health implications for healthy aging.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As digital technologies evolve, addictive algorithms and designs (aADs) have become a significant public health concern, particularly for older adults, a demographic often overlooked in digital addiction (DA) discourse. Compared to younger users, some older adults may face increased susceptibility to aADs due to factors such as cognitive changes, social isolation, physical comorbidities, or limited digital literacy. These designs, which exploit features like infinite scrolling, are associated with higher risk of compulsive use and may correlate with long-term impacts on cognitive health, social functioning, and quality of life for certain subgroups of older adults. Existing regulatory frameworks predominantly focus on protecting minors, often neglecting the distinct needs and vulnerabilities within aging populations. This paper advances a pluralistic governance framework that recognizes the diversity among older adults. Recommended measures include behaviorally informed disclosures, algorithmic transparency, tailored digital literacy programs, culturally responsive safeguards, and antitrust actions against exploitative design. Age-inclusive regulation is urgently needed to address potential risks of digital dependency, mental health concerns, and social inequalities among aging populations. Addressing these challenges requires collaboration across sectors to ensure digital environments support autonomy and well-being at all ages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.