ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Evidence for a fading affect bias in subjectively assessed affect changes in autobiographical memory.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Big Five Personality Factors Differentially Related to Positive and Negative Affect Intensity of Autobiographical Memories.Scandinavian journal of psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Over time, autobiographical memories (AMs) can decrease in affect intensity (fading affect), increase in affect intensity (flourishing affect), remain the same (fixed affect), or change valence (flexible affect). In this regard, the fading affect bias (FAB) names the phenomenon that, on average, negative AMs' affect intensity fades more strongly and more rapidly over time than positive AMs' affect intensity, which sometimes even increases on average. The FAB has most often been investigated using difference scores between retrospective ratings of AMs' initial affect intensity and their affect intensity from a current perspective (calculated change). The goal of the present study was to complement this previous research by additionally investigating the FAB in Method: Mixed-effects multinominal models were used to predict the probabilities of the different types of subjective change, which were then compared with their likelihood in calculated change. Moreover, the influence of initial intensity, neuroticism, and life satisfaction was compared between subjective change and calculated change. Analyses were based on 12,314 AMs reported by 2,163 adults aged 18-98 years. Results: A clear FAB was found for both subjective and calculated change. Neuroticism and life satisfaction showed comparable effects on subjective and calculated change, but the effects of initial intensity differed. Specifically, the effects of initial intensity on the probability of flourishing and flexible affect in subjective change were in the same direction as for calculated change, albeit with substantially weaker effect sizes. Moreover, only for subjective change did initial intensity have an effect on the likelihood of fading affect (negative effect). Discussion: The present findings extend previous knowledge of the FAB and its predictors, particularly with regard to initial intensity. Moreover, the present study supports the idea of an emotion-regulating, self-serving functionality of autobiographical memory, also within subjective emotional changes, and sheds an optimistic light on the appropriateness of retrospective designs in FAB studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.