ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Mixture Multilevel SEM vs. Multilevel SEM for comparing structural relations across groups in presence of measurement non-invariance.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-national validation of digital health engagement scales: evidence from 30 countries.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural equation modeling (SEM) is commonly used to explore relations between latent variables, such as beliefs and attitudes. However, comparing structural relations across a large number of groups, such as countries or classrooms, can be challenging. Existing SEM approaches may fall short, especially when measurement non-invariance is present. In this paper, we propose Mixture Multilevel SEM (MixML-SEM), a novel approach to comparing relationships between latent variables across many groups. MixML-SEM gathers groups with the same structural relations in a cluster, while accounting for measurement non-invariance in a parsimonious way by means of random effects. Specifically, MixML-SEM captures measurement non-invariance using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis and, then, it estimates the structural relations and mixture clustering of the groups by means of the structural-after-measurement approach. In this way, MixML-SEM ensures that the clustering is focused on structural relations and unaffected by differences in measurement. In contrast, Multilevel SEM (ML-SEM) estimates measurement and structural models simultaneously, and both with random effects. In comparison to ML-SEM, MixML-SEM provides better estimates of the structural relations, especially when (some of) the groups are large. This is because combining information from multiple groups within a cluster leads to more accurate estimates of the structural relations, whereas, in case of ML-SEM, these estimates are affected by shrinkage bias. We demonstrate the advantages of MixML-SEM through simulations and an empirical example on how social pressure to be happy relates to life satisfaction across 40 countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.