Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40792084›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Differential pathways from personality to risk-taking: how extraversion and negative emotionality shape decision-making through overconfidence.

Yangxizhao He, Peng Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yangxizhao HeChina Center for Behavioral Economics and Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Peng LeiChina Center for Behavioral Economics and Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding mechanisms through which personality traits influence risk decision-making remains crucial in behavioral research. This study examined overconfidence as a mediator in personality-risk relationships, focusing on Extraversion and Negative Emotionality. Methods: We recruited 110 university students to complete the Game of Dice Task, Big Five Inventory-2, and General Knowledge Questionnaire. Mediation analyses using bootstrapping methods examined direct and indirect effects with demographic controls. Results: Mediation analyses revealed distinct patterns. Extraversion demonstrated partial mediation through overconfidence (indirect effect: β = 0.101, 95% CI [0.012, 0.228]), explaining 20.5% of the total effect. Negative Emotionality showed complete mediation through overconfidence (indirect effect: β = -0.216, 95% CI [-0.364, -0.091]), accounting for 72.8% of the total effect. The models explained 29.4% and 22.9% of variance respectively. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that personality traits influence risk decisions through distinct pathways: Extraversion operates through both direct behavioral tendencies and cognitive biases, while Negative Emotionality primarily influences risk behavior through confidence calibration. Results provide implications for theoretical development and practical interventions, suggesting personality-tailored approaches to risk management.

Indexed as

behavior economicsGame of Dice Taskmediation effectoverconfidencepersonality traitsrisk decision-making

Identifiers

PMID40792084
PMCPMC12336267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.