Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40792057›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Limited day-to-day variation in the canine gut microbiota: implications for microbiome studies.

David Atuahene, Luke Wolfe, Oona Elisabet Vanhatalo, Benjamin T Veenstra, Joseph H Skarlupka, Katie L Anderson, Garret Suen, Giorgia Meineri, Jessica C Pritchard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Role of Olfaction in Dogs: Evolution, Biology, and Human-Oriented Work.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David AtuaheneDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Luke WolfeDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Oona Elisabet VanhataloDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, WI, United States.
Benjamin T VeenstraDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, WI, United States.
Joseph H SkarlupkaDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Katie L AndersonDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, WI, United States.
Garret SuenDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Giorgia MeineriDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Jessica C PritchardDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, WI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome is vital for health and affects gastrointestinal, systemic, and neurological functions. In dogs, fecal samples provide an effective mechanism to assess the gut microbiota as they are non-invasive, easily obtained, and representative of the gut microbiome. However, traditional methods usually require sampling across three consecutive days per time point to minimize the presumed variation in the gut microbiome. Here, we sought to investigate whether the gut microbiome obtained from a single-day fecal sampling is reflective of the microbiome obtained from three-day collections. To accomplish this, we collected fecal samples from 12 dogs over 3 days and compared each single-day microbiome against the combined microbiotas of the three-day samples. We found no significant daily variation in the gut microbiota, as determined by two one-sided tests of equivalence (TOST) analysis, indicating that there are little to no day-to-day changes in the microbiota. Further microbial comparisons using PERMANOVA (

Indexed as

day-to-day variationdogs gut microbiomefecal samplingmicrobiome assessmentnon-invasive sampling

Identifiers

PMID40792057
PMCPMC12337483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.