ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2025
Triphasic CT Radiomics Model for Preoperative Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pathological Grading.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive Efficacy of a Combined Triphasic CT Radiomics and Clinical Feature Model for Ki-67 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a triphasic CT-based radiomics model for the synchronous prediction of multiple critical pathological markers in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 174 patients with 187 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions. Radiomic features (n = 2264) were extracted from arterial phase (AP), venous phase (VP), and delayed phase (DP) CT images. Key features were selected using minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR), SelectKBest, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms. Logistic regression and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were employed to develop individual phase-specific models and a triphasic fusion model. Model performance was evaluated through the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, decision curve analysis, and other metrics. Results: The triphasic fusion model demonstrated superior performance. In the testing 1 dataset, the triphasic fusion model achieved AUCs of 0.890 (95% CI: 0.741-1), 0.895 (95% CI: 0.781-1) and 0.829 (95% CI: 0.675-0.984) for Edmondson-Steiner (Ed) grading, Microvascular invasion (MVI) grading, and Satellite nodule (SN) grading, respectively. In the testing 2 (validation) dataset, the triphasic fusion model achieved AUCs of 0.836 (95% CI: 0.739-0.934), 0.871 (95% CI: 0.748-0.993) and 0.810 (95% CI: 0.656-0.963) for Ed, MVI, and SN grading, respectively. The performance of the fusion model was better than that of the single-phase models. Conclusion: The triphasic CT radiomics model provides a noninvasive tool for preoperative prediction of HCC pathological grading (Ed, MVI, SN), enhancing diagnostic accuracy for clinical decision-making and prognostic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.