Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40792026›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Influences of structural helicity of aortic dissection on endovascular repair.

Shi-Cheng Jin, Zi-Long Zhao, Xuyang Zhang, Peng Lv, Cheng Yan, Tiantong Xu, Jialing Yang, Lixin Wang, Zhihui Dong, Daqiao Guo and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shi-Cheng JinInstitute of Solid Mechanics, School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Zi-Long ZhaoInstitute of Solid Mechanics, School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Xuyang ZhangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Peng LvDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Cheng YanDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Tiantong XuShanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jialing YangInstitute of Solid Mechanics, School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Lixin WangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Zhihui DongDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Daqiao GuoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xi-Qiao FengInstitute of Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Weiguo FuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Baolei GuoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stanford type B aortic dissections often exhibit helical morphology. However, the influences of structural helicity on periprocedural and mid-to long-term adverse events after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remain unclear. In this article, a total of 197 patients who underwent TEVAR between October 2019 and December 2020 were studied. Among them, 93 patients were excluded, and 104 patients were analyzed. The maximum helical angles and the maximum twists were measured using an efficient morphological method based on computed tomography angiography images. The whole dissecting aorta was divided into five zones. The visceral aortic zone exhibited the most pronounced structural helicity compared with other zones. Patients with the maximum helical angle larger or smaller than 200° were categorized into two groups, i.e., the groups of strong helicity and weak helicity. The patients in the strong helicity group exhibited a greater likelihood of experiencing adverse events after TEVAR.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular medicinePublic health

Identifiers

PMID40792026
PMCPMC12337707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.