Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40792024›Full record

ReviewiScience2025

Optimizing the implementation of safe and sustainable by design to better enable sustainable innovation.

Ramya Rajagopal, Florence Bohnes, Predrag Kukic, Giles Rigarlsford, Evita Vandenbossche-Goddard, Bruno Campos, Claire Davies, Ian Malcomber, Gavin Maxwell, Sarah Sim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Wastewater Treatment Challenges and Circular Reuse for One Health Sustainability: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  4. A call for chemical safety and sustainability.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ramya RajagopalUnilever Home Care, Environmental and Regulatory Science, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK.
Florence BohnesUnilever Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Science, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK.
Predrag KukicUnilever Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Science, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK.
Giles RigarlsfordUnilever Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Science, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK.
Evita Vandenbossche-GoddardUnilever Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Science, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK.
Bruno CamposUnilever Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Science, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK.
Claire DaviesUnilever Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Science, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK.
Ian MalcomberUnilever Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Science, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK.
Gavin MaxwellUnilever Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Science, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK.
Sarah SimUnilever Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Science, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of safe and sustainable by design (SSbD) combines considerations of human safety, environmental safety, and sustainability. The SSbD framework developed by the European Commission's (EC) Joint Research Centre (JRC) and the Safe(r) and Sustainable Innovation Approach (SSIA) developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) are two key examples of how SSbD concepts could be implemented in future regulatory frameworks. SSbD assessment can greatly aid the innovation process to ensure that new chemicals/materials, processes, and products are safe and sustainable throughout the life cycle. Unilever is a global consumer goods company that integrates the latest safety and sustainability science and SSbD principles in the innovation process. In this work, we review the JRC SSbD framework and OECD SSIA, taking into consideration the reflections of stakeholders through a review of published and gray literature, to evaluate to what extent they enable SSbD innovation. We make recommendations on how current gaps and challenges can be addressed to enable maximal uptake by all stakeholders across the value chain. The recommendations are mainly aimed at ensuring that the JRC SSbD framework and OECD SSIA are conceptually robust and addressing the practical elements in the use of the latest scientific methodology, availability of data, tools, guidance, and a standardized approach to interpreting results and decision-making, through short- and longer term efforts.

Indexed as

ChemistryGreen chemistry

Identifiers

PMID40792024
PMCPMC12335962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.