ArticleBlood neoplasia2025
Real-world performance of the CALGB 10403 regimen in young adults in the United States.
Article in Blood neoplasia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Cancer and Leukemia Group B 10403 (C10403) trial prospectively demonstrated the safety and efficacy of administering an asparaginase-containing pediatric regimen for the treatment of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Since its implementation as standard of care, it is unknown how the C10403 regimen performs beyond the clinical trial setting. To bridge this knowledge gap, we designed a multicenter retrospective cohort study to examine the safety, efficacy, and challenges of completing C10403 in the "real world." From October 2012 through June 2020, a total of 139 patients began induction as per the C10403 regimen across 6 US academic cancer centers. The median age was 26 years (range, 17-39), 69% were male, 55% were non-Hispanic White, and 27% were Hispanic. Among them, 122 patients (88%) achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CR/CRi) with C10403, 48 (35%) completed maintenance therapy, and 47 (34%) changed postremission regimens while in CR/CRi. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) was 66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55-74), and the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 81% (95% CI, 74-87). Four deaths occurred while on C10403 treatment: 1 during induction; and 3 later in the treatment course. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events during induction included alanine aminotransferase elevation (22%) and sepsis (14%). B-cell immunophenotype (hazard ratio [HR], 2.45; 95% CI, 1.09-5.48), Philadelphia chromosome-like genetics (HR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.25-7.44), and Hispanic ethnicity (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.06-3.78) were associated with worse EFS in univariate analyses. Overall, these real-world results are comparable to those of the C10403 trial. Further improvements are needed to enhance outcomes and regimen tolerability in the AYA population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.