ArticlePeerJ2025
Unveiling the mental state: validating the uBioMacpa Pro stress measurement tool among Chinese college students.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental stress is a significant contributor to various health issues, including cardiovascular disease, anxiety, and depression. Scholars have developed many tools and methods to evaluate psychological stress states. uBioMacpa Pro is one of the measuring meters that evaluates accumulated stress by measuring heart rate variability (HRV). This study uses reliability and validity tests to validate uBioMacpa Pro among Chinese college students. A total of 260 students (females = 146, males = 114) with a mean age of 21 years (SD = 1.48, 1.51) were volunteers and recruited in the reliability and validity tests, respectively. The heart rate variability parameters showed satisfactory test-retest and inter-rater reliability, with the most intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values exceeding the acceptable threshold of 0.75. Validity assessment was done by exploring concurrent validity that measured the psychological stress of college students by using uBioMacpa Pro and using the validated Chinese version of the Stress Scales for College Students (C-SSCS) as a reference. The result showed a significant correlation between the uBioMacpa Pro stress index and C-SSCS questionnaire scores (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.