ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025
Computed tomography angiography in chronic coronary syndrome: Association to catheterization laboratory activity and survival.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Female Disparity in Referral to Cardiac Diagnostication and Invasive Treatment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study objective: To investigate catheterization laboratory efficiency and mortality in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients before and after introduction of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Design: Registry study. Setting: Western Denmark Heart Registry. Participants: We included all first entry adults with suspected CCS undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or CCTA from year 2000 through year 2020 in Western Denmark. There was a total of 142.815 procedures (ICA 68.640, CCTA, 74.175, and revascularization 32.311 procedures). Interventions: ICA, CCTA and coronary revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary arterial bypass grafting. Main outcome measures: The use of ICA and CCTA, revascularization by PCI or CABG, catheterization laboratory efficiency (revascularization/ICA ratio), and all-cause mortality. Results: During the study period, the percentage of revascularized patients decreased from 45.7 % to 13.3 %, because of increasing use of CCTA. The revascularization/ICA ratio decreased from 46.3 % to 40.1 %. In all CCTA-first patients, 2.7 % of women and 6.9 % of men had a revascularization procedure within 6 months. One- and five-year mortality in revascularized patients decreased by 56 % and 4 % and in non-revascularized patients diagnosed with ICA first by 49 % and 26 %, respectively. Both revascularized and non-revascularized patients had better survival than the background population. Conclusions: The extensive use of CCTA did not reduce the number of ICA procedures without subsequent revascularization, and few CCTA-first patient had a subsequent revascularization procedure. We found increased survival in CCTA/ICA diagnosticated patients as compared to the background population possibly due to better prognostication and general treatment in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.