Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791925›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025

Real-World Experience of Dupilumab Treatment for Patients with COPD - A Single Center Prospective Study.

Ophir Freund, Omer Meoded, Tala Arnaout, Inbal Friedman Regev, Aviv Kupershmidt, Sharon Enghelberg, Doron Cohn-Schwartz, Liran Levy, Amir Bar-Shai

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Short-Term Effects of Dupilumab in Eosinophilic COPD.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ophir FreundThe Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7272-5284
Omer MeodedThe Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tala ArnaoutThe Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Inbal Friedman RegevThe Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Aviv KupershmidtThe Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sharon EnghelbergThe Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Doron Cohn-SchwartzThe Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Liran LevyThe Sheba Lung Transplant Program and Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Sheba Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Amir Bar-ShaiThe Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Dupilumab was recently shown to be effective in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 inflammation, while real-world data are missing. We aimed to evaluate the experience of COPD patients treated with Dupilumab. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with COPD treated with Dupilumab were approached and completed a structured interview. Before treatment, all patients had blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/μL and prior-year exacerbations despite triple inhaler therapy. Results: Twenty-three subjects were included, with median (IQR) treatment of 320 (280-355) days, median age of 75 years, and 52% female. A decrease in mean annualize exacerbation rate was observed from 3.47 at baseline to 1.55 after treatment (55% reduction). Number of severe exacerbations decreased as well (median 1 vs 0 over the same time frame). There was a decrease in the median COPD assessment test scores (median of 18 vs 15), although FEV1 did not change. One patient had skin-related side effect. Sixty-one percent were content with the treatment, and 74% would recommend it to others with COPD. During interview, patients reported on their need and openness to new and safe treatment options. Using the Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) tool, 30% reported on marked improvements following dupilumab. Treatment limitations were costs (48%) and repeated injections (21%). Conclusion: In this case-series, dupilumab was shown to be well tolerated and was associated with lower rates of exacerbations and improved symptoms. These outcomes were supported by patient reported outcome measurements.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsLungPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionSeverity of Illness IndexAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory Agentsdupilumabbiologic therapychronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseeosinophilsexacerbationsimmunologic treatment

Identifiers

PMID40791925
PMCPMC12336371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.