Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025
Real-World Experience of Dupilumab Treatment for Patients with COPD - A Single Center Prospective Study.
Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in COPD: a German multicenter analysis.Respiratory research · 2026Observational
- COPD Biologics: Right Patient, Right Pathway, Right Time.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Biologics in Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Dupilumab in Severe Asthma-COPD Overlap: Real-Life Experience on a Case Series.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Short-Term Effects of Dupilumab in Eosinophilic COPD.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Biologics for eosinophilic COPD: current applications and future prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Real-World Identification of Eosinophilic COPD Patients Potentially Eligible for Dupilumab: A Retrospective Observational Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Observational
- Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Type 2 Inflammation: A Single-Center Real-World Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Dupilumab was recently shown to be effective in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 inflammation, while real-world data are missing. We aimed to evaluate the experience of COPD patients treated with Dupilumab. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with COPD treated with Dupilumab were approached and completed a structured interview. Before treatment, all patients had blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/μL and prior-year exacerbations despite triple inhaler therapy. Results: Twenty-three subjects were included, with median (IQR) treatment of 320 (280-355) days, median age of 75 years, and 52% female. A decrease in mean annualize exacerbation rate was observed from 3.47 at baseline to 1.55 after treatment (55% reduction). Number of severe exacerbations decreased as well (median 1 vs 0 over the same time frame). There was a decrease in the median COPD assessment test scores (median of 18 vs 15), although FEV1 did not change. One patient had skin-related side effect. Sixty-one percent were content with the treatment, and 74% would recommend it to others with COPD. During interview, patients reported on their need and openness to new and safe treatment options. Using the Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) tool, 30% reported on marked improvements following dupilumab. Treatment limitations were costs (48%) and repeated injections (21%). Conclusion: In this case-series, dupilumab was shown to be well tolerated and was associated with lower rates of exacerbations and improved symptoms. These outcomes were supported by patient reported outcome measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.