ReviewAnnals of joint2025
Subchondral bone contribution to osteochondral health and injury.
Review in Annals of joint, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subchondral Bone Regeneration of the Porcine Knee Joint Using α-TCP Biocement Enriched with Manuka Honey-Qualitative Pilot Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Design Strategies to Target Joint Resident Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Osteochondral Regeneration.Cells · 2026Review
- Natural Biomaterials for Osteochondral Repair: From Source to Strategy.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Overview of joint tissue alterations in femoroacetabular impingement: What we know through laboratory analyses.Histology and histopathology · 2026Review
- The Role of Plastin in Bone, Cartilage, and Related Diseases.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subchondral bone plays a critical yet often underappreciated role in osteochondral health, injury response, and the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis (OA). A limited understanding of subchondral bone behavior limits the accurate evaluation of cartilage repair outcomes. Alterations in the subchondral bone-such as changes in bone density and structure, subchondral cyst (SCC) formation, impairment of osseous microarchitecture, and overgrowth of the subchondral plate-can compromise the mechanical osteochondral unit's integrity, leading to compromised joint function and poor outcomes. Moreover, neuropathy and subchondral bone changes, both significant contributors to OA-related pain and progression, are rarely assessed in treatment strategies. A deeper understanding of subchondral bone dynamics could improve both the assessment of repair outcomes and the development of more effective therapeutic strategies for OA. In the context of cartilage procedures, clinical and translational studies revealed that up to one-third of patients undergoing microfracture or similar subchondral venting procedures exhibit clinically pathologic subchondral bone changes. These include cyst formation and upward migration of the bone plate, which negatively affect repair outcomes. Translational models further support these findings by elucidating the mechanisms of subchondral bone remodeling and its critical influence on cartilage health. This review focuses on recent translational research on the subchondral bone in both osteochondral health, injury, and OA, highlighting the need to preserve its integrity during cartilage repair and ensuring that subchondral bone is considered in OA therapy. Understanding subchondral bone alterations may guide repair strategies, including biologic therapies and biomaterial-based approaches aimed at restoring osteochondral function, paving the way for improved clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.