ReviewAnnals of joint2025
Acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joint injuries in contact sports: a narrative review of conservative and surgical treatments.
Review in Annals of joint, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Posterior Sternoclavicular Joint Dislocation Presenting as Acute Torticollis in a Kabaddi Player: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint sprain and sternoclavicular (SC) joint injuries commonly occur in contact athletes due to the direct-blow mechanism of injury. Despite the high prevalence in this patient population, a small degree of literature on AC and SC joint injuries specifically pertain to contact athletes. The goal of this narrative review is to analyze the literature pertaining to AC and SC joint injuries in both contact athletes and the general population and to provide treatment recommendations specifically for the contact athlete. Methods: A review of PubMed and MEDLINE was completed to identify articles reporting on the surgical and nonoperative treatment of AC and SC joint injuries in athletes. In this initial screen, the authors excluded general reviews, case reports, duplicate studies between databases and publications in languages other than English. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS). The authors then conducted a search for studies comparing non-operative to operative treatment of AC and SC joint injuries, in addition to studies comparing between operative technique. Key Content and Findings: Non-operative management of AC and SC joint injuries offer an acceptable return-to-play timeline. Despite persistent pathologic radiographic appearance in certain cases of non-operative management, clinical outcomes are generally equivalent between athletes treated non-operatively as compared to operatively. In cases of a failed course of nonoperative treatment, surgical management can achieve high return-to-sport rates, though is generally associated with longer recovery intervals. Despite mechanism of injury, rate of successful return to previous level does not appear to correlate with degree of contact in a sport, but instead with overhead demand of the sport. Conclusions: Contact athletes with AC and SC joint injuries should be trialed with a course of nonoperative management, even in higher grade injuries, with some exceptions. Athletes should be appropriately counseled, with particular attention paid to positions requiring increased overhead demand. When surgery is required, non-rigid anatomic fixation allows for a high rate of return to sport with less complications compared to rigid fixation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.