ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery: a machine learning study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based risk assessment of neonatal perinatal adverse outcomes of anemia during pregnancy: a modeling study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Prediction of peak oxygen uptake using interpretable machine learning on routinely available preoperative assessments before lung resection.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery: a narrative review of clinical advances and applications in 2025.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Interpretable machine learning for predicting in-hospital mortality in COPD ICU patients: a rigorous validation across time and geography.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression in breast cancer using a combined radiomics model based on 18F-FDG PET/CT.Medicine · 2026Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence Interpret Pulmonary Function Tests and Predict Prolonged Air Leaks After Lung Resection.Cancers · 2026Article
- Emerging enzymatic modifications and AI-driven strategies for smart tailoring of taste characteristics in food-derived peptides: A review.Food chemistry: X · 2026Review
- Identification and validation of an explainable machine learning model for early postoperative pulmonary complications after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- A Causal and interpretable machine learning framework for postcranioplasty risk prediction and surgical decision support.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- 3D intratumoral heterogeneity-based quantitative score from chest CT for preoperative prediction of visceral pleural invasion in lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- A prehabilitation-enhanced nomogram for predicting early pulmonary recovery failure after lung tumor surgery: development and multicenter validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning integrating immune-related cells, immunoglobulins, and immuno-inflammatory markers identifies risk factors for pulmonary comorbidities in ankylosing spondylitis: stratified analyses by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary nodules.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Pediatric Sepsis: Machine Learning Development and Multicenter Validation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Observational
- Perioperative ΔNLR and ΔPNI independently predict postoperative pulmonary complications in non-small cell lung cancer: a difference analysis-based nomogram.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Explainable random forest-SHAP framework for Montreal phenotype-stratified prediction of one-year complications in Crohn's disease.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based predictive model for postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer and its SHAP interpretation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of intrinsic capacity based on Andersen Model among older adults: a national cross-sectional study in China.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Application of risk prediction model to evaluate the effect of mechanical ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in thoracic surgery.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Multimorbidity quantification from the perspective of precision management: challenges and strategies.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early identification and prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are vital for patient management in lung cancer (LC) surgery. However, existing predictive models often lack comprehensive validation and interpretability. This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model to predict PPCs in patients with LC undergoing surgery. Methods: A risk factor variable pool was determined by meta-analysis and Delphi surveys. Patients undergoing LC surgery who were admitted to the Thoracic Surgery Department at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from 1st January 2022 to 31st October 2023 (retrospective) and from 1st November 2023 to 31st July 2024 (prospective) were used for model development and prospective validation, respectively. The retrospective cohort was randomly split into a training set and an internal validation set at an 8:2 ratio. Feature selection involved univariate analysis, collinearity analysis, nine ML algorithms, and expert consensus. Twelve independent ML models and 26 stacking ensemble models were developed. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. Prospective validation was analysed using AUC, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) method was utilised to interpret the predictive model. Findings: A total of 883 patients were included in the retrospective cohort with an incidence of PPCs of 35.4% (313/883), and a total of 308 patients were included in the prospective cohort with PPCs of 29.5% (91/308). Nine key characteristics were selected for model development: age, duration of surgery, Charson comorbidity index (CCI), tumour stage, measured carbon monoxide diffusion (DLCO, mmol/min/kPa), intra-operative infusion volume (IFIV, mL), red blood cell volume distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV, %), body mass index (BMI), and number of years of smoking. Amongst the independent models, the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) showed best performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.774-0.885). The stacking ensemble combining Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT) showed the highest overall performance, with an AUROC of 0.860 (95% CI: 0.809-0.911), and DCA showed higher clinical utility compared to other models. In the prospective validation, the AUROC was 0.790 (95% CI: 0.744-0.835). Interpretation: The stacking ensemble model combining SVM and DT demonstrated robust predictive performance and favourable clinical utility for prediction PPCs in patients undergoing LC surgery. However, the model has not been applied in clinical practice and requires future validation in large, multi-centre cohorts. Further work should aim to identify high-risk patients early through clinical data analysis, enabling timely interventions and more efficient allocation of limited healthcare resources. Funding: The Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Health Commission; the Key Talent Team of Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Innovation; and Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Basic Research Project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.