Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791887›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery: a machine learning study.

Shaolin Chen, Ting Deng, Qing Yang, Jin Li, Juanyan Shen, Xu Luo, Juan Tang, Xulian Zhang, Jordan Tovera Salvador, Junliang Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shaolin ChenNursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou Province, China.
Ting DengNursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou Province, China.
Qing YangSchool of Nursing, Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua, Hunan Province, China.
Jin LiThoracic Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou Province, China.
Juanyan ShenNursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou Province, China.
Xu LuoSchool of Medical Information Engineering, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou Province, China.
Juan TangThoracic Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou Province, China.
Xulian ZhangThoracic Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou Province, China.
Jordan Tovera SalvadorNursing Education Department, College of Nursing, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Junliang MaThoracic Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early identification and prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are vital for patient management in lung cancer (LC) surgery. However, existing predictive models often lack comprehensive validation and interpretability. This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model to predict PPCs in patients with LC undergoing surgery. Methods: A risk factor variable pool was determined by meta-analysis and Delphi surveys. Patients undergoing LC surgery who were admitted to the Thoracic Surgery Department at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from 1st January 2022 to 31st October 2023 (retrospective) and from 1st November 2023 to 31st July 2024 (prospective) were used for model development and prospective validation, respectively. The retrospective cohort was randomly split into a training set and an internal validation set at an 8:2 ratio. Feature selection involved univariate analysis, collinearity analysis, nine ML algorithms, and expert consensus. Twelve independent ML models and 26 stacking ensemble models were developed. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. Prospective validation was analysed using AUC, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) method was utilised to interpret the predictive model. Findings: A total of 883 patients were included in the retrospective cohort with an incidence of PPCs of 35.4% (313/883), and a total of 308 patients were included in the prospective cohort with PPCs of 29.5% (91/308). Nine key characteristics were selected for model development: age, duration of surgery, Charson comorbidity index (CCI), tumour stage, measured carbon monoxide diffusion (DLCO, mmol/min/kPa), intra-operative infusion volume (IFIV, mL), red blood cell volume distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV, %), body mass index (BMI), and number of years of smoking. Amongst the independent models, the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) showed best performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.774-0.885). The stacking ensemble combining Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT) showed the highest overall performance, with an AUROC of 0.860 (95% CI: 0.809-0.911), and DCA showed higher clinical utility compared to other models. In the prospective validation, the AUROC was 0.790 (95% CI: 0.744-0.835). Interpretation: The stacking ensemble model combining SVM and DT demonstrated robust predictive performance and favourable clinical utility for prediction PPCs in patients undergoing LC surgery. However, the model has not been applied in clinical practice and requires future validation in large, multi-centre cohorts. Further work should aim to identify high-risk patients early through clinical data analysis, enabling timely interventions and more efficient allocation of limited healthcare resources. Funding: The Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Health Commission; the Key Talent Team of Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Innovation; and Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Basic Research Project.

Indexed as

Lung cancerMachine learningPostoperative pulmonary complicationsStacking ensemble model

Identifiers

PMID40791887
PMCPMC12337024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.