ArticleFrontiers in audiology and otology2024
Optical method to preserve residual hearing in patients receiving a cochlear implant.
Article in Frontiers in audiology and otology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Subglottic imaging puncture scope (SIPS) for minimally invasive endoscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Worldwide, thousands of patients with severe to profound hearing loss restore their hearing with cochlear implant (CI) devices. Newer developments in electrode design and manufacturing and a better understanding of cochlear mechanics allow for conserving critical structures, often translating into serviceable residual hearing and improving device performance. Monitoring insertion speed and intraluminal pressure helps mitigate some of these challenges. However, the information becomes available after irreparable damage has occurred. Methods: We developed and tested a high-resolution optical system to navigate the intricate anatomy of the cochlea during electrode insertion. The miniaturized optical system was integrated in conventional cochlear implants electrode arrays and custom-made cochlear probes. Electrode insertion were conducted in eight cadaveric human temporal bones and video recordings were acquired. Micro-computed tomography (μCT) scans were performed to evaluate the position of the modified electrode arrays. Results: Full insertions of the modified CI electrode were successfully conducted and verified by μCT scans. Video recordings of the cochlear structures visible in scala tympani were acquired, and no scala migration was detected. Discussion: Surgeons can now follow the CI electrode's path during its insertion and reduce cochlear damage through early interventions and steering of the CI electrode. Our device will be compatible with robotic platforms that are already available to insert these electrodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.