ArticlePsoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Effectiveness and Safety of Tildrakizumab in Elderly and Frail Elderly Psoriatic Patients Up to 2 years.
Article in Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Tildrakizumab in Elderly Patients With Psoriasis: A Narrative Review.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2026Review
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Tildrakizumab in a Large Spanish Multicenter Cohort from Spanish Psoriasis Group (GPS).Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biologic therapy in geriatric psoriasis: 6-month real-world data on PASI, inflammatory indices, and hepatitis B/tuberculosis safety.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Article
- IL-23 Inhibitors in Psoriasis: What Have We Learnt so Far?Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Elderly patients with age ≥65 years represent an increasing percentage of the population with moderate-severe psoriasis. The definition of "frail elderly" is not easily framed, generally meaning a patient with unstable homeostasis. To date, there is no study in the literature examining possible differences between frail and non-frail elderly with psoriasis being treated with tildrakizumab. Patients and Methods: The present multicentre retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness, drug survival and safety up to 2 years of treatment with tildrakizumab in the elderly (≥65 years) comparing frail and non-frail patients. Frail patients were defined as those with: i) 2 major comorbidities, or 1 major comorbidity and low economic level ii) and/or 2 of the following 5 parameters: weight loss, weakness, sluggishness, low activity level, and exhaustion. Results: A total of 217 patients aged ≥65 years were enrolled, of whom 89 (41%) were grouped in the frail patient category. In the entire population, 2-year drug survival was ≥80%, and PASI 90 and ≤2 was achieved in 75% and 87.5% of patients, respectively. No difference in effectiveness or safety was found between frail and non-frail populations. Adjusting for baseline characteristics at Cox-regression, frail patients did not show a greater risk of discontinuation (HR 0.51, p=0.091). Conclusion: Tildrakizumab showed good safety and effectiveness at 2 years in the elderly population with or without frailty, confirming it as a possible treatment of choice in psoriatic patients with significant comorbidities and older frail patients who deserve systemic treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.