ArticleClinical interventions in aging2025
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy-Related Inflammation: Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Experience.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early vs Delayed Steroid Treatment in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy-Related Inflammation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The present study aims to analyze the clinical manifestations, laboratory results, neuroimaging features, treatment interventions, and outcomes in a cohort of patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation (CAA-ri), providing a deeper understanding of this rare subtype of CAA and enhancing diagnostic precision in clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a systematic retrospective review of clinical records from 13 consecutive patients who met the diagnostic criteria for probable CAA-ri and were evaluated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2021 and August 2024. Results: The study cohort comprised 13 patients (7 males, 6 females; mean age 65.2 years, range 42-81), predominantly presenting with subacute onset (53.8%, n=7). Cognitive impairment (61.5%, n=8) emerged as the most frequent clinical manifestation, followed by headache (46.2%, n=6), epileptic seizures (30.8%, n=4), and focal neurological deficits (23.1%, n=3). Neuroimaging findings across all patients demonstrated asymmetric white matter hyperintensities in conjunction with cortical-subcortical cerebral microbleeds. A subset of patients exhibited cortical superficial siderosis lobar hemorrhage, and/or punctate acute infarction. Among the nine patients who underwent lumbar puncture, five showed elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure and protein levels. All four patients assessed for CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers showed reduced Aβ42 and Aβ40 levels, alongside elevated total tau and phosphorylated tau levels. Furthermore, over 70% of the patients who treated with immunosuppressive therapy achieved favorable clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Clinical manifestations and neuroimaging abnormalities serve as pivotal non-invasive criteria for guiding clinicians in the diagnosis of CAA-ri. Timely initiation of immunosuppressive therapy in CAA-ri patients can lead to favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.