ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2025
Exploring the influence of the nanoporous structure of nickel-based superalloy membranes on emulsification performance.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoporous structures made from nickel-based superalloy are fairly new and not thoroughly studied membrane materials for premix membrane emulsification. They show a different kind of pore structure than other membranes typically used in this process with a network of elongated, interconnected pores (150-400 nm). Two different membrane structures, resulting from different creep strains, times and temperatures during production, were investigated for their performance in premix membrane emulsification. The membranes were used in a system with a fixed process pressure, varying specific energy input via pressure or number of emulsification cycles. Furthermore, membranes with different manufacturing parameters and thicknesses were used. Both membrane structures achieved monomodal droplet size distributions with median droplet sizes under 500 nm in one emulsification cycle. The results indicate that while all droplet sizes fall within a comparable range, the pore sizes still play a significant role, with finer pores resulting in smaller droplets but broader droplet size distribution that showed minimal further breakup after repeated passes. The larger, more irregular pores showed the ability to further breakup droplets with increasing emulsification cycles, broadening their distribution. The findings also suggest that a pressure increase activates smaller pores that seem to remain inactive for emulsification at lower pressures, facilitating more transport and droplets breakup. Results underscore the critical role of elongational flow at the membrane inlet in promoting droplet breakup. This study strengthens the theory that droplet breakup in premix membrane emulsification requires droplets to be stretched as they enter the membrane, then breakup either spontaneously by surface instabilities when remaining in this elongated state for a sufficient time or deterministically by mechanical stresses such as shear caused by a tortuous channel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.