ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Using expert-cited features to detect leg dystonia in cerebral palsy.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Leg dystonia in cerebral palsy (CP) is debilitating but remains underdiagnosed. Routine clinical evaluation has only 12% accuracy for leg dystonia diagnosis compared to gold-standard expert consensus assessment. We determined whether expert-cited leg dystonia features could be quantified to train machine learning (ML) models to detect leg dystonia in videos of children with CP. Methods: Eight pediatric movement disorders physicians assessed 298 videos of children with CP performing a seated task at two CP centers. We extracted leg dystonia features cited by these experts during consensus-building discussions, quantified these features in videos, used these quantifications to train 4664 ML models on 163 videos from one center, and tested the best performing models on a separate set of 135 videos from both centers. Results: We identified 69 quantifiable features corresponding to 12 expert-cited leg dystonia features. ML models trained using these quantifications achieved 88% sensitivity, 74% specificity, 82% positive predictive value, 84% negative predictive value, and 82% accuracy for identifying leg dystonia across both centers. Of the 25 features contributing to the best performing ML models, 17 (68%) quantified leg movement variability. We used these ML models to develop DxTonia, open-source software that identifies leg dystonia in videos of children with CP. Interpretation: DxTonia primarily leverages detection of leg movement variability to achieve 82% accuracy in identifying leg dystonia in children with CP, a significant improvement over routine clinical diagnostic accuracy of 12%. Observing or quantifying leg movement variability during a seated task can facilitate leg dystonia detection in CP.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.