ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Deep learning predicts cardiac output from seismocardiographic signals in heart failure.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Determination of cardiac output (CO) is essential to the clinical management of cardiovascular compromise. However, the invasiveness, procedural risks, and reliance on specialized infrastructure limit accessibility and scalability of standard-of-care right heart catheterization (RHC). Seismocardiography (SCG), a non-invasive technique which records subtle chest wall vibrations generated by cardiac mechanical activity, may offer a promising alternative for CO determination. Objectives: To develop and evaluate a deep learning model for estimating CO directly from SCG, electrocardiogram (ECG), and body mass index (BMI) in heart failure patients undergoing RHC. Methods: We trained a deep convolutional neural network for CO estimation using an open-access dataset comprising 73 heart failure patients with simultaneous RHC, SCG, and ECG recordings. Model performance was evaluated using a rotating leave-pair-out cross-validation strategy. Results: When estimating CO, the deep learning model achieved a mean bias of -0.35 L/min with limits of agreement (LoA) from -2.21 to 1.51 L/min. When predicting cardiac index in patients with a reference index < 2.2 L/min/m Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using deep learning in combination with wearable SCG sensors to non-invasively estimate CO. Model performance was particularly strong in low-output states. These findings highlight the potential of SCG-based monitoring to augment clinical decision-making in settings where invasive measurements are impractical or unavailable. Prospective multicenter validation is needed to confirm generalizability and assess clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.