ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Informing People-Centered Target Product Profiles for TB Diagnostics: A Multi-Country Qualitative Study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Timely and accurate tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis remains a key challenge in high-burden settings. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed Target Product Profiles (TPPs) to guide diagnostic development, which have largely reflected the perspectives of experts, with limited input from people affected by TB. This qualitative study explored preferences and experiences to inform people-centered TB diagnostic strategies. Methods: We conducted 75 semi-structured interviews with adults undergoing TB evaluation at outpatient clinics in India, the Philippines, South Africa, Uganda, and Vietnam. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure diversity in sex, TB status, age and treatment. Thematic analysis was utilized. Findings: Preferences were shaped by five interrelated domains: perceived diagnostic accuracy, sample collection experience, time-to-results, affordability, and testing location. Diagnostic accuracy was consistently prioritized, with many expressing willingness to trade comfort and convenience for more trustworthy results. Sputum and blood were widely trusted despite collection challenges, whereas tongue swabs and urine were easier to provide but perceived as less accurate. Rapid, same-day turnaround was valued for minimizing emotional distress, financial and logistical burdens. Although testing was typically free, indirect costs such as transport and lost income, remained barriers. Hospital-based testing was preferred due to trust in staff and infrastructure, though some acknowledged the appeal of community-based approaches if reliability and privacy were ensured. Conclusion: People seeking TB care prioritize accuracy and trustworthiness, even at the expense of comfort or convenience. These preferences can inform WHO policy updates, especially regarding the adoption of novel sample types and testing strategies, to support uptake and equitable access to novel diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.