ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Combining Real and Synthetic Data to Overcome Limited Training Datasets in Multimodal Learning.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomedical data are inherently multimodal, capturing complementary aspects of a patient condition. Deep learning (DL) algorithms that integrate multiple biomedical modalities can significantly improve clinical decision-making, especially in domains where collecting data is not simple and data are highly heterogeneous. However, developing effective and reliable multimodal DL methods remains challenging, requiring large training datasets with paired samples from modalities of interest. An increasing number of de-identifed biomedical datasets are publicly accessible, though they still tend to be unimodal. For example, several publicly available skin lesion datasets aid automated dermatology clinical decision-making. Still, they lack annotated reports paired with the images, thereby limiting the advance and use of multimodal DL algorithms. This work presents a strategy exploiting real and synthesized data in a multimodal architecture that encodes fine-grained text representations within image embeddings to create a robust representation of skin lesion data. Large language models (LLMs) are used to synthesize textual descriptions from image metadata that are subsequently paired with the original skin lesion images and used for model development. The architecture is evaluated on the classification of skin lesion images, considering nine internal and external data sources. The proposed multimodal representation outperforms the unimodal one on the classification of skin lesion images, achieving superior performance in every tested dataset.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.