Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791669›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025

Qualitative and quantitative retrieval analysis of a ball-and-socket cervical disc replacement.

Jenna M Wahbeh, Sophia N Sangiorgio, Sang-Hyun Park, G Bryan Cornwall, Neha V Kulkarni, Roberto Chiesa, Edward Ebramzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jenna M WahbehThe J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, The Luskin Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Alliance with UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Sophia N SangiorgioThe J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, The Luskin Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Alliance with UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Sang-Hyun ParkThe J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, The Luskin Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Alliance with UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
G Bryan CornwallShiley-Marcos School of Engineering, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Neha V KulkarniHenry Samueli School of Engineering Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Roberto ChiesaDepartment of Chemistry, Materials, and Chemical Engineering, Politecnico Milano, Milan, Italy.
Edward EbramzadehThe J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, The Luskin Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Alliance with UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Porous Coated Motion (PCM) is a ball-and-socket cervical disc replacement with excellent reported short-term clinical outcome. However, longer-term studies identified migration as a common cause of implant removal and the device was withdrawn from the market. Given these discrepancies, retrieval analyses are crucial to assess whether preclinical testing accurately predicts clinical performance. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze retrieved PCM devices to identify primary reasons for removal and assess the impact of observed damage on overall device fixation. Methods: Thirty-seven PCM devices were received for postmarket surveillance. Nondestructive analysis included visual examination, photographic documentation, and radiographic review. Analytical measurements were performed using a coordinate measuring machine to assess articulating surfaces or a digital microscope for endplate surface feature characterization. Oxidation analysis was performed on all devices with adequate handling and storage conditions, and histopathology was performed when tissue samples were available. Results: Twenty-five devices met the inclusion criteria for this study. The mean patient age at retrieval was 45.3±13.5 years, with an average time-in-vivo of 121±15.6 days. Anterior migration was the most common reason for removal, reported in 17 cases, with the inferior convex polyethylene component predominately migrating. Additionally, 17 devices had a focalized deviation on the posterior quadrant of the articulating polyethylene ball, 11 of which had evidence of radiographic clinical migration. Histopathology and metrology findings indicated that wear debris did not contribute to clinical failure. Conclusions: The findings of the present study, specifically the minimal bony ongrowth, lack of extraction damage, and radiographic imaging, indicated that most devices were removed due to migration. Metrology analysis revealed a depression on the posterior edge of the inferior endplate polyethylene ball, which correlated with anterior slippage. This may be a distinctive feature of the PCM's relatively large ball-and-socket design that led to increased stress during extension, causing anterior migration.

Indexed as

Cervical arthroplastyCervical disc replacementDevice designDevice fixationInitial stabilityMigrationPCM deviceRetrieval analysis

Identifiers

PMID40791669
PMCPMC12337878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.