ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025
Toxic posterior segment syndrome caused by silicone oil tamponade resulting in postsurgical retinal vascular occlusion: a case report.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unexplained vision loss following silicone oil removal: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Toxic posterior segment syndrome induced by silicone oil tamponade after surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a case report.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to report a rare case of postoperative retinal vessel occlusion caused by silicone oil. Observations: A 71-year-old male patient presented with decreased visual acuity and was diagnosed with macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD). The patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and was administered a silicone oil injection. The day after surgery, although inflammation and hyperemia within the anterior chamber were mild, fundus examination revealed evidence of retinal blood vessel occlusion. The patient was assumed to have contracted bacterial endophthalmitis and underwent PPV again, wherein the silicone oil was removed followed by antibiotic administration and steroid eye drops initiation. The inflammation improved 2 weeks after surgery; the patient underwent a second operation for MHRD and was administered a silicone oil injection. However, the same vascular occlusion findings were observed the day after surgery. Vascular occlusion was thought to be due to sterile inflammation rather than bacterial endophthalmitis; the inflammatory findings subsided after silicone oil removal. Conclusions: In cases of retinal vascular occlusion occurring early after silicone oil injection, if the anterior segment inflammation is mild, the possibility of toxic posterior segment syndrome must be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.