ArticleSurgery in practice and science2025
A retrospective study to investigate the effect of pressurized incision dressing on the occurrence of incisional infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been established as the gold standard for gallstone treatment due to its minimal invasiveness and rapid recovery. Despite the low incidence of complications after LC, postoperative incisional infections have received widespread attention from surgeons. This study aimed to evaluate whether pressurized incision dressing could reduce the occurrence of incisional infections. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 396 patients diagnosed with gallbladder stones who underwent LC at our institution between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients were divided into standard dressing group A (n=200) and pressurized dressing group B (n=196) based on different postoperative incisional treatments. Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Additionally, subset analyses were conducted on patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m Results: The incisional infection rate was 8.0 % (16/200) in the standard dressing group A and 6.1 % (12/196) in the pressurized dressing group B, with no significant difference. Among patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m Conclusions: Pressurized incision dressing can reduce the incidence of incisional infection after LC in patients with AC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.