Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791626›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Results of a national survey among occupational physicians to estimate the number of workers with active medical devices and their types in the context of managing electromagnetic hazards.

Rebecca Gasparini, Fabriziomaria Gobba, Andrea Bogi, Giovanni Calcagnini, Federica Censi, Rosaria Falsaperla, Eugenio Mattei, Cecilia Vivarelli, Simona D'Agostino, Alberto Modenese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rebecca GaspariniDepartment of Biomedical Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Fabriziomaria GobbaDepartment of Biomedical Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Andrea BogiPhysical Agents Sector, Regional Public Health Laboratory, South-East Tuscany Health Unit, Siena, Italy.
Giovanni CalcagniniDepartment of Cardiovascular, Endocrin-metabolic Diseases and Aging, Italian Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Federica CensiDepartment of Cardiovascular, Endocrin-metabolic Diseases and Aging, Italian Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Rosaria FalsaperlaDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, Italian National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work, Rome, Italy.
Eugenio MatteiDepartment of Cardiovascular, Endocrin-metabolic Diseases and Aging, Italian Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Cecilia VivarelliDepartment of Cardiovascular, Endocrin-metabolic Diseases and Aging, Italian Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Simona D'AgostinoDepartment of Information Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alberto ModeneseDepartment of Biomedical Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) is almost ubiquitous: workers with Active Implantable Medical Devices (AIMD) and Active Wearable Medical Devices (AWMD) are considered at particular risk with respect to occupational risk assessment and health surveillance (HS) procedures, due to possible electromagnetic hazards resulting in interference problems. The identification of these workers is therefore fundamental for prevention purposes. Aim of the study is to provide an estimate of the proportion of workers with AIMD and AWMD, and to list the main types of devices involved. Methods: We performed an online survey among a sample of Occupational Physicians (OPs) from two Italian Regions. Results: 132 OPs responded, based their answers on a whole number of more than 200,000 workers visited within HS activities in the previous year. Our results show that the 0.8% of the working population in Italy can be estimated as "particularly at risk" for EMF exposure at the workplaces due to the presence of AIMD or AWMD. The most common AIMD resulted pacemakers and implanted cardioverter defibrillators, involving the 0.24% of the workers. Considering AWMD, the most common resulted hearing aids and hormones/drugs pumps, respectively worn by the 0.25 and the 0.17% of the working population. Discussion: It should be taken into account that potential interference problems could also occur for levels of exposure to EMFs comparable to those measurable for non-professionally exposed populations. Accordingly, the conditions of increased susceptibility to EMF hazards must be carefully considered for a proper occupational EMF risk prevention: the data presented in this work provide a solid foundation for quantifying the actual impact of workers with AIMD and AWMD in the workplaces, and the main types of devices involved.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic FieldsOccupational ExposurePhysiciansWearable Electronic DevicesAdultFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSurveys and Questionnairesactive implanted medical devicesactive wearable medical deviceselectromagnetic interferenceoccupational electromagnetic fields exposureworkers' health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID40791626
PMCPMC12336113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.