ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Risk identification and assessment of Internet public opinion on public emergencies based on Bayesian network and association rule mining.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global public emergencies occur frequently, and the risk of Internet public opinion crises in such contexts is gradually increasing. In the dual context of risk society and network society, effectively identifying and assessing Internet public opinion risks on public emergencies poses challenges to the efficiency and response speed of public crisis management. This paper innovatively proposes an Internet public opinion risk identification and assessment method for public emergencies, integrating association rule mining with Bayesian network (BN). The core innovation lies in designing an improved scheme based on the CBA (Classification Based on Associations) algorithm to overcome the limitation of traditional association rule mining in handling non-Boolean data, thereby effectively extracting the correlations among public opinion risk factors to optimize the topological structure of the BN. Building upon this foundation, we construct a BN model with strong interpretability to identify the public opinion key risk factors and key risk chains of different risk levels, as well as to evaluate the public opinion situation. Empirical results demonstrate that, compared with the traditional BN assessment model based on expert experience, the BN model incorporating association rules achieves a 14.4% increase in assessment accuracy and exhibits more pronounced advantages in performance metrics such as precision, recall, specificity, and F-measure. The proposal of this innovative method not only enhances the accuracy of public opinion risk assessment but also provides a new perspective for data-driven identification of key risk factors and research on their complex interactions. Furthermore, it provides an interpretable and computationally efficient decision support tool for public opinion crisis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.