ArticleJournal of extracellular biology2025
Cerebrospinal Fluid-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: A Proteomic and Transcriptomic Comparative Analysis of Enrichment Protocols.
Article in Journal of extracellular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- HSPA8 orchestrates SNARE complex assembly to drive extracellular vesicle-mediated spread of p-tau217 in Alzheimer's disease.Translational neurodegeneration · 2026Article
- Placental Small Extracellular Vesicles Undetected in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Preeclamptic and Eclamptic Women.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- The New Spine of Access to the Brain's Secrets: Extracellular Vesicles from Cerebrospinal Fluid Liquid Biopsies in CNS Diseases and Blood-Brain Barrier Research.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Extracellular RNAs as Messengers and Early Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cerebrospinal Fluid-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: A Proteomic and Transcriptomic Comparative Analysis of Enrichment Protocols.Journal of extracellular biology · 2025Article
- The immune landscape of cerebrospinal fluid across brain malignancies.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) offer unique insights into molecular changes associated with central nervous system (CNS) diseases and may result in biomarker identification. No gold standard method to enrich EVs from CSF has been established, and head-to-head comparisons of outputs of different protocols are scarce. Using a large pool of CSF, we characterised the EV preparations resulting from four enrichment protocols and compared them in terms of yield and purity. We found that particles enriched by ultracentrifugation (UC) or a combination of ultrafiltration and size exclusion chromatography (UF-SEC) exhibited the typical morphological and biochemical characteristics of small EVs and were highly enriched in proteins and polyadenylated (polyA) transcripts associated with EV-related biological processes. UF-SEC preparations had higher particle yields, whilst more proteins were identified in UC preparations. Approximately 40% of the EV preparations' proteome was not identified in unenriched CSF, among which a core proteome of 45 proteins was identified in 30 EV preparations from independent experiments, which may serve as CSF-derived EV markers. Enrichment scores to protein contaminants, albumin and apolipoprotein E were higher in UF-SEC preparations. In conclusion, all protocols analysed here resulted in enrichment of particles with small EV characteristics, with EV enrichments from UF-SEC resulting in the highest yield and purity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.