Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791568›Full record

ArticleJournal of extracellular biology2025

Cerebrospinal Fluid-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: A Proteomic and Transcriptomic Comparative Analysis of Enrichment Protocols.

Marta García-Arauzo, Sandrine Reymond, Lyssia Gruaz, Domitille Schvartz, Natacha Civic, Mylène Docquier, Christine Deffert, Pascal Colosetti, Jean-Charles Sanchez, Claire Bridel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of extracellular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Extracellular RNAs as Messengers and Early Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marta García-ArauzoTranslational Biomarker Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland.
Sandrine ReymondTranslational Biomarker Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-1988
Lyssia GruazTranslational Biomarker Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland.
Domitille SchvartzProteomics Core Facility, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland.
Natacha CiviciGE3 Genomics Platform, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland.
Mylène DocquieriGE3 Genomics Platform, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland.
Christine DeffertDivision of Laboratory Medicine Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland.
Pascal ColosettiUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon1 CarMeN Laboratory, Inserm, INRAe Lyon France.
Jean-Charles SanchezTranslational Biomarker Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland.
Claire BridelTranslational Biomarker Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7267-7676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) offer unique insights into molecular changes associated with central nervous system (CNS) diseases and may result in biomarker identification. No gold standard method to enrich EVs from CSF has been established, and head-to-head comparisons of outputs of different protocols are scarce. Using a large pool of CSF, we characterised the EV preparations resulting from four enrichment protocols and compared them in terms of yield and purity. We found that particles enriched by ultracentrifugation (UC) or a combination of ultrafiltration and size exclusion chromatography (UF-SEC) exhibited the typical morphological and biochemical characteristics of small EVs and were highly enriched in proteins and polyadenylated (polyA) transcripts associated with EV-related biological processes. UF-SEC preparations had higher particle yields, whilst more proteins were identified in UC preparations. Approximately 40% of the EV preparations' proteome was not identified in unenriched CSF, among which a core proteome of 45 proteins was identified in 30 EV preparations from independent experiments, which may serve as CSF-derived EV markers. Enrichment scores to protein contaminants, albumin and apolipoprotein E were higher in UF-SEC preparations. In conclusion, all protocols analysed here resulted in enrichment of particles with small EV characteristics, with EV enrichments from UF-SEC resulting in the highest yield and purity.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluidexosomesextracellular vesiclesmass spectrometryRNA sequencingsize‐exclusion chromatographyultracentrifugation

Identifiers

PMID40791568
PMCPMC12339045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.