ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Protein Abundance Inference via Expectation Maximization in Fluorosequencing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorosequencing produces millions of single-peptide reads, yet a principled strategy for converting these data into quantitative protein abundances has been lacking. We introduce a probabilistic framework that adapts expectation maximization to the fluorosequencing measurement process, estimating relative protein abundances with peptide inference results delivered by previously developed peptide-classification tools. The algorithm iteratively updates protein abundances, maximising the likelihood of the observed reads by obtaining more accurate protein abundance estimations. We first assess performance on simulated five-protein mixtures that reflect realistic labelling and system errors. A simple Python implementation processes one million reads in under ten seconds on a standard work-station and lowers the mean absolute error in relative abundance by more than an order of magnitude compared with a uniform-abundance guess, demonstrating robustness in protein inference for small-scale settings. Scalability is then evaluated with simulations of the complete human proteome (20 642 proteins). Ten million reads are processed in less than four hours on a NVIDIA DGX system using one Tesla V100 GPU, confirming that the method remains tractable at proteome scale. Using error rates characteristic of current fluorosequencing, the algorithm produces marginal improvements in relative abundance accuracy. However, when error rates were artificially lowered, estimation error decreased significantly. This result suggests that improvements in fluorosequencing chemistry could directly translate into substantially more accurate quantitative proteomics with this computational framework. Together, these results establish EM-based inference as a scalable model-driven bridge between peptide-level classification and protein-level quantification in fluorosequencing, laying computational groundwork for highthroughput single-molecule proteomics. Furthermore, the proposed protein inference framework can also be used as a refinement step within other inference methods, enhancing their protein abundance estimates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.