ArticleBrain & spine2025
Nimodipine after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: shortened treatment in an unselected patient cohort.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Branch-Critical Clipping of a Ruptured Carotid-Posterior Communicating Aneurysm with Fetal PCA Configuration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comment on shortened treatment with nimodipine in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Brain & spine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nimodipine improves outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) through mitigation of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Most studies are based on a treatment duration of 21 days. At our institution, clinical practice is to administer nimodipine for 14 days, regardless of bleeding severity. Treatment is prolonged if signs or symptoms of DCI occurs. The present study aims to review this practice. Methods: A prospective cohort of aSAH patients was reviewed and relevant information regarding nimodipine treatment were retrospectively added to this database. Functional outcome was measured using Glasgow outcome scale extended (GOSE) one year after ictus and dichotomized into unfavorable and favorable outcome. Radiological outcome was defined by the occurrence of new cerebral infarctions on brain imaging later than 30 days post-ictus. Results: The study population comprised 164 patients, out of which 97 (59 %) received nimodipine for 14 days or less. Unfavorable outcome was noted in 27 % of patients and brain imaging found cerebral infarctions in 17 % of patients. Both outcome measures were similar to previously published studies. No readmissions or signs of DCI were seen after discontinuation of nimodipine. Conclusions: A shortened nimodipine treatment period in patients without DCI after aSAH could be feasible. This may reduce sleep deprivation of patients and more effective utilization of neurointensive care resources. A large, randomized study is required to answer the question whether a shorter treatment with nimodipine is adequate to give full benefit of the medication in patients without signs and symptoms of DCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.