ArticleHealth science reports2025
Effectiveness of a Single-Use Polyurethane Foam Positioning Pad Compared With Five-Layer Foam Sacral Dressing for Pressure Ulcer Prevention in the Operating Room: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06790277 (Effectiveness of Polyurethane Foam), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Polyurethane Foam (Pink Pad) Compared With Mepilex Dressing for Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Operating Room: A Randomized Control Clinical Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Among cardiac surgery patients, risk factors for pressure ulcers include prolonged pressure exposure during lengthy surgeries, vascular disease, and postoperative vasopressor use. Conventional pressure ulcer prevention methods may be inadequate for these high-risk patients. This study evaluated the effectiveness of polyurethane foam (pink pad) versus a five-layer sacral foam dressing in preventing pressure ulcers in the operating room. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Western Saudi Arabia, including 100 cardiac surgery patients undergoing procedures lasting over 4 h. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either a polyurethane foam pink pad ( Results: In total, 111 patients were screened for eligibility, and 100 patients were included and allocated to both groups. Results showed that 6% of patients in the polyurethane foam group developed Stage I pressure ulcers, while no cases were observed in the five-layer foam sacral dressing group, with no statistically significant difference ( Conclusion: Both dressings were effective in minimizing pressure ulcer incidence, although the five-layer foam sacral dressing showed slightly better performance, achieving complete pressure ulcer prevention. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06790277).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.