Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791282›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Effectiveness of a Single-Use Polyurethane Foam Positioning Pad Compared With Five-Layer Foam Sacral Dressing for Pressure Ulcer Prevention in the Operating Room: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Ebtisam Abdellatif Elhihi, Samah Ali Almuwallad, Bayan Mansour Alqrashi, Esmail Mohamed Nada, Naif Ahmed Alduaiji, Abdullah Abdulrahman Alfakeeh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06790277 (Effectiveness of Polyurethane Foam), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06790277 narecruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness of Polyurethane Foam (Pink Pad) Compared With Mepilex Dressing for Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Operating Room: A Randomized Control Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Abdullah Medical CityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsCardiac Surgery Subjects, Pressure Ulcer Prevention, Pressure Ulcer of Skin, Pressure UlcerArmsMepilex Border Sacrum dressings, Polyurethane foams (Pink Pad)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ebtisam Abdellatif ElhihiNursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Department King Abdullah Medical City Makkah Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3452-6989
Samah Ali AlmuwalladWound Care Department King Abdullah Medical City Makkah Saudi Arabia.
Bayan Mansour AlqrashiOperating Room, King Abdullah Medical City Makkah Saudi Arabia.
Esmail Mohamed NadaOperating Room, King Abdullah Medical City Makkah Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2159-5597
Naif Ahmed AlduaijiOperating Room, King Abdullah Medical City Makkah Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Abdulrahman AlfakeehOperating Room, King Abdullah Medical City Makkah Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Among cardiac surgery patients, risk factors for pressure ulcers include prolonged pressure exposure during lengthy surgeries, vascular disease, and postoperative vasopressor use. Conventional pressure ulcer prevention methods may be inadequate for these high-risk patients. This study evaluated the effectiveness of polyurethane foam (pink pad) versus a five-layer sacral foam dressing in preventing pressure ulcers in the operating room. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Western Saudi Arabia, including 100 cardiac surgery patients undergoing procedures lasting over 4 h. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either a polyurethane foam pink pad ( Results: In total, 111 patients were screened for eligibility, and 100 patients were included and allocated to both groups. Results showed that 6% of patients in the polyurethane foam group developed Stage I pressure ulcers, while no cases were observed in the five-layer foam sacral dressing group, with no statistically significant difference ( Conclusion: Both dressings were effective in minimizing pressure ulcer incidence, although the five-layer foam sacral dressing showed slightly better performance, achieving complete pressure ulcer prevention. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06790277).

Indexed as

five‐layer foam sacral dressingpolyurethane foampressure injurypressure ulcer

Identifiers

PMID40791282
PMCPMC12336279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.