Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791271›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Experiences and perceptions about vaccines and reporting of adverse events following immunisation: a qualitative study among mothers in Northern Ghana.

Nana Akosua Ansah, Daniel Weibel, Samuel Tamti Chatio, Samuel Tomilola Oladokun, Enyonam Duah, Patrick Ansah, Abraham Oduro, Miriam Sturkenboom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nana Akosua AnsahNavrongo Health Research Centre, Navrongo, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0536-6349
Daniel WeibelUMC, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1685-1478
Samuel Tamti ChatioNavrongo Health Research Centre, Navrongo, Ghana.
Samuel Tomilola OladokunNavrongo Health Research Centre, Navrongo, Ghana.
Enyonam DuahNavrongo Health Research Centre, Navrongo, Ghana.
Patrick AnsahNavrongo Health Research Centre, Navrongo, Ghana.
Abraham OduroGhana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Miriam SturkenboomUMC, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immunisation is an essential and cost-effective way of preventing infectious diseases. The emergence of new diseases, including COVID-19, along with advancements in malaria vaccines, has potentially led to an increase in vaccinations, particularly among children under 5 years old in Africa. However, concerns about vaccine safety have led to a decline in trust and greater vaccine hesitancy, as evidenced by the low uptake of newly introduced vaccines like the pneumococcal vaccine-13 in Ghana.Adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs) may range from mild to severe and are of concern because vaccines are generally given to healthy people. To monitor vaccine safety, it is important that those who experience adverse events report to the nearest health facility, but compliance is low in Ghana. This study explored the knowledge and experiences of mothers in northern Ghana regarding vaccine safety and adverse event reporting procedures. Methods: This cross-sectional exploratory study used a qualitative research design that involved 10 focus group discussions (FGDs) with mothers from 5 administrative regions in resource-limited Northern Ghana. Participants for the FGDs were selected through a purposive sampling method at childhood vaccination clinics. All the interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded into themes using QSR NVivo V.12 software to aid thematic content analysis. Results: The results revealed that mothers understood the need for vaccinations, although some were unaware of the diseases that the vaccines protect against. Even though most mothers knew about the benefits of vaccinations, many expressed concerns about the pain and discomfort their children experienced during the process. Furthermore, they noted that the absence of responses from health workers following the reporting of AEFIs, the belief that adverse events are commonplace, and previous vaccination experiences all influenced AEFI reporting. The fear of serious adverse events such as paralysis, coupled with insufficient explanation of the benefits, may dissuade parents from allowing their children to receive vaccinations. The findings also revealed that mothers were not adequately informed about vaccines and the need for them to report adverse events. Conclusions: Many individuals regard vaccines as an essential public health intervention for preventing diseases and their related complications. Public health agencies and healthcare providers ought to address concerns about vaccine adverse events by providing thorough education for mothers about vaccines and AEFI reporting.

Indexed as

PharmacovigilancePublic HealthVaccination

Identifiers

PMID40791271
PMCPMC12336584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.