ArticleBMJ public health2025
Do education and use of family planning methods empower women? Evidence from the Nepal Demographic Health Survey (NDHS) 2016 and 2022.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess how education and the use of family planning methods intersect to influence women's empowerment among currently married women of reproductive age in Nepal. Design setting and participants: The study analysed a combined weighted sample of 21 023 currently married women in the age group (15-49 years) using data sets of two cross-sectional Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS). A weighted analysis of the samples was carried out, accounting for the complex survey design. In NDHS 2016, the sample size was 9,868, and in NDHS 2022, it was 11, 155. Thirteen indicators that have been used in previous studies were employed to measure women's empowerment. To examine the relationship between education, family planning use and women's empowerment, a multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was conducted, taking into account cluster and survey weights. Outcome measures: Women's empowerment is the primary outcome measure, which was assessed using a composite index of 13 indicators based on previous studies. The indicators encompassed sexual and reproductive autonomy, participation in household decision-making, control over financial decisions and attitudes towards wife-beating. Results: The results indicate that women with higher education and those who use family planning methods are significantly more empowered, with adjusted ORs of 3.764 (95% CI 2.894 to 4.895) in 2016 and 4.541 (95% CI 2.914 to 7.079) in 2022 compared with women without education and family planning use. This consistent pattern across both surveys highlights a significant association between education, family planning use and women's empowerment. Conclusion: The study suggests the importance of advocating for education and family planning use as interlinked pathways to empower women. To fulfil Sustainable Development Goal 5-achieving gender equality and empowering all women and girls-government must ensure intersectional strategies that remove barriers to education and reproductive autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.