Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791262›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Design and maintenance of community-based cohorts in sub-Saharan Africa: a longitudinal evaluation of participant attrition in SchistoTrack.

Christin Puthur, Betty Nabatte, Benjamin Tinkitina, Narcis B Kabatereine, Goylette F Chami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christin PuthurBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Betty Nabatte *Division of Vector Borne and Neglected Tropical Diseases, Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Benjamin Tinkitina *Division of Vector Borne and Neglected Tropical Diseases, Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Narcis B KabatereineDivision of Vector Borne and Neglected Tropical Diseases, Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Goylette F ChamiBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4653-0846

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding participant attrition in longitudinal studies is essential for maintaining cohorts, establishing targeted interventions and assessing potential biases introduced in study analyses. Yet, limited metrics, models and long-term assessments exist for the design and evaluation of community-based cohorts in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods: We prospectively assessed participant attrition in the SchistoTrack cohort. A total of 2885 individuals aged 5-92 years, who were recruited in 2022, were examined from 1445 randomly sampled households across three rural Ugandan districts. Baseline data on sociodemographics, medical history, spatial factors and clinical examinations were collected, with annual and seasonal follow-ups to 2025. Profiles of attriters and rejoiners were established with logistic regressions. Community engagement, retention strategies and study expansion to 4321 participants were evaluated. Results: Overall attrition rates were stable across the years, ranging from 20.9% to 27.7%. Attriter profiles were established within the first year and were stable predictors of the recurrent attrition. Older individuals were less likely (OR 0.987, 95% CI 0.983 to 0.991), whereas more educated individuals were more likely to be lost to follow-up (OR 1.086, 95% CI 1.057 to 1.117). Individuals belonging to larger households and homes closer to government health centres were less likely to have an attrition event (ORs 0.920-0.924). Fishermen were not more likely than other individuals to have an attrition event, either overall or seasonally. 63.3% (374/591) of participants who dropped out from the first major follow-up and 54.1% (725/1341) of all participants who had any loss to follow-up for reasons other than death later rejoined the study. Schistosome infection and medical referrals were not associated with later attrition. Communicating clinical findings, adjusting incentives and study logistics did not influence attrition. Conclusions: By providing metrics and models for tracking attrition, our attrition analysis framework can guide the design and evaluation of community-based cohorts in rural sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlCommunity HealthEpidemiologic MethodsPublic HealthStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40791262
PMCPMC12336594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.