Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791252›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Differences in Olfactory Discrimination, but Not Sensitivity, Between African Savanna and Asian Elephants.

Melissa H Schmitt, Matthew S Rudolph, Sarah L Jacobson, Joshua M Plotnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa H SchmittDepartment of Biology University of North Dakota Grand Forks North Dakota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5544-7673
Matthew S RudolphDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College City University of New York New York New York USA.
Sarah L JacobsonDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College City University of New York New York New York USA.
Joshua M PlotnikDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College City University of New York New York New York USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While African savanna and Asian elephants split between 4.2 and 9 MYA, they are often regarded as one united group, 'elephants.' This is surprising because, while both are keystone species in their respective habitats, each faces different environmental pressures and has rarely been compared experimentally. In general, African savanna elephants must locate resources that vary spatially and temporally across patchy savannas, while Asian elephants do so within dense, high-biodiversity forests. Both species use olfaction to guide decision-making; however, considering their ecologies, we hypothesize that their olfactory abilities differ. Thus, we investigated the sensitivity limits and discrimination abilities of both savanna and Asian elephants' olfactory systems, and changes in these limits in a complex odor environment. We employed two odor-based choice experiments, using

Indexed as

cognitionevolutionary ecologyforaging ecologyolfactionsensory abilities

Identifiers

PMID40791252
PMCPMC12339044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.