ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Sex-specific effects of tea consumption and salt intake on metabolic syndrome and its components among oilfield workers.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined associations of tea consumption and smoking with accelerated biological aging among oilfield workers.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Association of novel triglyceride-glucose index-derived indices with hyperuricemia among oilfield workers.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Association between different metabolic obesity phenotypes and hyperuricemia: the modifying role of liver enzymes.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Lipoprotein combined index and prevalent hyperuricemia among normolipidemic oilfield workers: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic stratification in the association between tea consumption and skeletal muscle mass among oilfield workers.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Interconnected associations of occupational burnout, anxiety, and sleep quality in oilfield workers.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been rising globally, posing a significant public health challenge. While numerous studies have examined the risk factors for MetS, limited research has explored the combined effects of tea consumption and salt intake on MetS, particularly from a sex-specific perspective. Methods: The Chinese Diabetes Society criteria were adopted to identify MetS patients, and the logistic regression analysis was employed to explore the association between tea consumption, salt intake, and MetS. The odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results: Among the 2,721 oilfield workers, 28.30% were diagnosed with MetS, with males displaying a higher prevalence than females across all individual components. Higher tea consumption was associated with an increased risk of MetS and specific components in males, whereas salt intake demonstrated a more selective impact, primarily affecting triglyceride levels in males and waist circumference in females. When considering the combined effects, males with high tea consumption and high salt intake exhibited the highest risk of MetS (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.30 to 2.57, Conclusion: This study highlights the sex-specific impact of tea consumption and salt intake on MetS, with a significant association observed only in males. The combined exposure to high tea consumption and high salt intake may exacerbate MetS risk, emphasizing the need for tailored dietary recommendations. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.