Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791211›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Postoperative Disparities Facing Patients Experiencing Homelessness: Opportunities for Advocacy From an Anesthesiology Perspective.

Ashwin Mahesh, Sarah Chowdhury, Dana Gurvitch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashwin MaheshAnesthesiology, Weill Cornell, New York City, USA.
Sarah ChowdhuryAnesthesiology, Weill Cornell, New York City, USA.
Dana GurvitchAnesthesiology, Weill Cornell, New York City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients experiencing homelessness (PEH) continue to face significant disparities across the world. Many of these disparities not only have downstream medical consequences but also housing-based consequences, including propagation of chronic homelessness. The postoperative period is a time of great medical vulnerability for PEH. Without targeted intervention, PEH are at risk for progression of disparate outcomes and chronic vulnerability. As integral players in the patient's care team during this period, anesthesiologists are uniquely positioned to address these disparities and drive change for a critically marginalized population. In this review, we examine the current literature on disparities impacting PEH in the postoperative period, highlighting key areas such as complications, hospitalization length, readmission rates, acute emergency department (ED) utilization, cost to the health system, postoperative follow-up, and discharge processes. Despite the potential impact of these disparities, there is a paucity of literature specific to PEH. Additionally, given the variability of findings between institutions and across surgical specialties, further research characterizing disparities on a local level is required. Despite these gaps in knowledge, there is an urgent need for the creation and assessment of actionable interventions aimed at improving care for PEH. Here, we analyze themes from our review and propose interventions that anesthesiologists can lead, in collaboration with health system colleagues, to foster change.

Indexed as

anesthesiologyerashealth equityhomelessnesspostoperative disparitiespublic health

Identifiers

PMID40791211
PMCPMC12337065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.