ReviewCureus2025
Postoperative Disparities Facing Patients Experiencing Homelessness: Opportunities for Advocacy From an Anesthesiology Perspective.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients experiencing homelessness (PEH) continue to face significant disparities across the world. Many of these disparities not only have downstream medical consequences but also housing-based consequences, including propagation of chronic homelessness. The postoperative period is a time of great medical vulnerability for PEH. Without targeted intervention, PEH are at risk for progression of disparate outcomes and chronic vulnerability. As integral players in the patient's care team during this period, anesthesiologists are uniquely positioned to address these disparities and drive change for a critically marginalized population. In this review, we examine the current literature on disparities impacting PEH in the postoperative period, highlighting key areas such as complications, hospitalization length, readmission rates, acute emergency department (ED) utilization, cost to the health system, postoperative follow-up, and discharge processes. Despite the potential impact of these disparities, there is a paucity of literature specific to PEH. Additionally, given the variability of findings between institutions and across surgical specialties, further research characterizing disparities on a local level is required. Despite these gaps in knowledge, there is an urgent need for the creation and assessment of actionable interventions aimed at improving care for PEH. Here, we analyze themes from our review and propose interventions that anesthesiologists can lead, in collaboration with health system colleagues, to foster change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.